Vikipeedia arutelu:Saatkond: erinevus redaktsioonide vahel

Selle lehekülje sisule puudub teiste keelte tugi.
Allikas: Vikipeedia
Eemaldatud sisu Lisatud sisu
Rschen7754 (arutelu | kaastöö)
253. rida: 253. rida:


However, if you as a community would like to create your own activity review process superseding the global one, want to make another decision about these inactive rights holders, or already have a policy that we missed, then please notify the [[:m:Stewards' noticeboard|stewards on Meta-Wiki]] so that we know not to proceed with the rights review on your wiki. Thanks, '''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 12. jaanuar 2015, kell 08:44 (EET)
However, if you as a community would like to create your own activity review process superseding the global one, want to make another decision about these inactive rights holders, or already have a policy that we missed, then please notify the [[:m:Stewards' noticeboard|stewards on Meta-Wiki]] so that we know not to proceed with the rights review on your wiki. Thanks, '''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 12. jaanuar 2015, kell 08:44 (EET)
:Mulle meeldiks küll, kui meil oleks oma poliitika. [[Kasutaja:Andres|Andres]] ([[Kasutaja arutelu:Andres|arutelu]]) 12. jaanuar 2015, kell 20:51 (EET)

Redaktsioon: 12. jaanuar 2015, kell 21:51

Arhiiv

IMPORTANT: Admin activity review

Hello. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc) was recently adopted by global community consensus (your community received a notice about the discussion). According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on smaller wikis. To the best of our knowledge, your wiki does not have a formal process for removing "advanced rights" from inactive accounts. This means that the stewards will take care of this according to the new admin activity review here.

We have determined that the following users meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for more than 2 years):

  1. Boy (administrator)
  2. KS (administrator)
  3. Lulu (administrator)
  4. Peep (administrator)
  5. Priitp (administrator)
  6. Ulla (administrator)

These users will receive a notification soon, asking them to start a community discussion if they want to retain some or all of their rights. If the users do not respond, then their advanced rights will be removed by the stewards.

However, if you as a community would like to create your own activity review process superseding the global one, want to make another decision about these inactive rights holders, or already have a policy that we missed, then please notify the stewards on Meta-Wiki so that we know not to proceed with the rights review on your wiki. Thanks, Rschen7754 17. august 2014, kell 06:48 (EEST)[vasta]

Tundub, et meil on olnud ligilähedane konsensus, et administraatoriõigusi mitteaktiivsuse pärast ära ei võeta. Muidugi tuleb sellest poliitikast varem või hiljem loobuda. Andres (arutelu) 17. august 2014, kell 07:45 (EEST)[vasta]
No tegelikult ei, kui selleteemaliste arutelude järgi otsustada. Arvamused mitteaktiivsuse küsimuses on jagunenud umbes pooleks. Kuna meil pole õnnestunud oma reegleid vastu võtta, siis kehtivad globaalsed reeglid ühes sealsete kriteeriumitega. Minu poolest võibki nii jääda. Pikne 17. august 2014, kell 11:43 (EEST)
Igatahes meil on võimalus oma reeglid kehtestada. Vastu meie tahtmist midagi ei tehta. Andres (arutelu) 17. august 2014, kell 13:20 (EEST)[vasta]

To sum up, currently there is no explicit opposition to remove rights from these six users in particular and we currently don't have plan to adopt a local policy regarding admin activity. Pikne 7. oktoober 2014, kell 15:27 (EEST)

Change in renaming process

Part or all of this message may be in English. Please help translate if possible.

-- User:Keegan (WMF) (talk) 9 September 2014 16.22 (UTC)

Tin Can Cathedral

Hello, I am looking for someone to translate the English Wikipedia article: Tin Can Cathedral into Estonian. I have put the text of the article into my Estonian Sandbox: Kasutaja:Nicola Mitchell/liivakast. Though I am not fluent in Estonian, if I had an Estonian text I would not have much difficulty creating this article in the Estonian Wikipedia. I am not interested in a stub, but in the translation of the entire article. I would be grateful for anyone who wishes to take a look at it and perhaps try their hand at it. Thank you. Nicola Mitchell (arutelu) 19. september 2014, kell 23:48 (EEST)Nicola Mitchell (arutelu) 19. september 2014, kell 23:50 (EEST)[vasta]

Ma ei tea, kes selle siia tõstis, aga minu meelest tõlkimispalve ei kuulu siia. Andres (arutelu) 22. september 2014, kell 12:46 (EEST)[vasta]
Siis tuleks Üldise arutelu päises olevat teksti muuta -- praegu on seal kirjas, et tõlked (?) tuleb lisada Saatkonna lehele... WikedKentaur (arutelu) 8. oktoober 2014, kell 22:16 (EEST)[vasta]

File metadata cleanup drive

Hi! As part of meta:File metadata cleanup drive, could some of you create a template for file information (d:Q6466010)? I see that this kind of template does not exist on the Estonian Wikipedia. You can take example of those given on the link or copy a simply version from meta:File metadata cleanup drive/How to fix metadata/Simple information template. Best regards, --Stryn (arutelu) 22. oktoober 2014, kell 22:07 (EEST)[vasta]

Ah, it's already at Mall:Pildiinfo. Then, let's cleanup the metadata, lol :) --Stryn (arutelu) 23. oktoober 2014, kell 18:25 (EEST)[vasta]

Meta RfCs on two new global groups

Hello all,

There are currently requests for comment open on meta to create two new global groups. The first is a group for members of the OTRS permissions queue, which would grant them autopatrolled rights on all wikis except those who opt-out. That proposal can be found at m:Requests for comment/Creation of a global OTRS-permissions user group. The second is a group for Wikimedia Commons admins and OTRS agents to view deleted file pages through the 'viewdeletedfile' right on all wikis except those who opt-out. The second proposal can be found at m:Requests for comment/Global file deletion review.

We would like to hear what you think on both proposals. Both are in English; if you wanted to translate them into your native language that would also be appreciated.

It is possible for individual projects to opt-out, so that users in those groups do not have any additional rights on those projects. To do this please start a local discussion, and if there is consensus you can request to opt-out of either or both at m:Stewards' noticeboard.

Thanks and regards, Ajraddatz (talk) 26. oktoober 2014, kell 20:04 (EET)[vasta]

New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (November 2014)

Apologies for writing in English, please help translate this into your local language. Hello Wikimedians!

The TWL OWL says sign up today :)

The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:

  • DeGruyter: 1000 new accounts for English and German-language research. Sign up on one of two language Wikipedias:
  • Fold3: 100 new accounts for American history and military archives
  • Scotland's People: 100 new accounts for Scottish genealogy database
  • British Newspaper Archive: expanded by 100+ accounts for British newspapers
  • Highbeam: 100+ remaining accounts for newspaper and magazine archives
  • Questia: 100+ remaining accounts for journal and social science articles
  • JSTOR: 100+ remaining accounts for journal archives

Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team.6. november 2014, kell 01:19 (EET)

You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.

Global AbuseFilter

Hello,

AbuseFilter is a MediaWiki extension used to detect likely abusive behavior patterns, like pattern vandalism and spam. In 2013, Global AbuseFilters were enabled on a limited set of wikis including Meta-Wiki, MediaWiki.org, Wikispecies and (in early 2014) all the "small wikis". Recently, global abuse filters were enabled on "medium sized wikis" as well. These filters are currently managed by stewards on Meta-Wiki and have shown to be very effective in preventing mass spam attacks across Wikimedia projects. However, there is currently no policy on how the global AbuseFilters will be managed although there are proposals. There is an ongoing request for comment on policy governing the use of the global AbuseFilters. In the meantime, specific wikis can opt out of using the global AbuseFilter. These wikis can simply add a request to this list on Meta-Wiki. More details can be found on this page at Meta-Wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on m:Talk:Global AbuseFilter.

Thanks,

PiRSquared17, Glaisher

— 14. november 2014, kell 19:34 (EET)

VisualEditor News #9—2014

15. november 2014, kell 01:29 (EET)

New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (December 2014)

Apologies for writing in English, please help translate this into your local language. Hello Wikimedians!

The TWL OWL says sign up today :)

The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for new accounts and research materials from:

Other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team.18. detsember 2014, kell 02:22 (EET)

You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.

VisualEditor News #10—2014

26. detsember 2014, kell 20:59 (EET)

IMPORTANT: Admin activity review

Hello. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc) was adopted by global community consensus in 2013. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on smaller wikis. To the best of our knowledge, your wiki does not have a formal process for removing "advanced rights" from inactive accounts. This means that the stewards will take care of this according to the admin activity review.

We have determined that the following users meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for more than 2 years):

  1. Siim (administrator)
  2. Urmas (administrator)

These users will receive a notification soon, asking them to start a community discussion if they want to retain some or all of their rights. If the users do not respond, then their advanced rights will be removed by the stewards.

However, if you as a community would like to create your own activity review process superseding the global one, want to make another decision about these inactive rights holders, or already have a policy that we missed, then please notify the stewards on Meta-Wiki so that we know not to proceed with the rights review on your wiki. Thanks, Rschen7754 12. jaanuar 2015, kell 08:44 (EET)[vasta]

Mulle meeldiks küll, kui meil oleks oma poliitika. Andres (arutelu) 12. jaanuar 2015, kell 20:51 (EET)[vasta]