Arutelu:Kompleksarv
Pealkiri peaks vist olema ainsuses? Jaan513 15:52, 14 May 2004 (UTC +3)
Jah. Andres 13:47, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
Üritasin teksti veidi paremaks muuta. Jaan513 31. mai 2006, kell 19.08 (UTC)
Praeguse definitsiooniga on see häda, et kompleksarvu ei saa defineerida arvu mõiste kaudu. Andres 31. mai 2006, kell 18.37 (UTC)
I don't speak your language, but manage to read it. The imaginary unit i is a special complex number with the characteristic property . This property should be mentioned in the definition.130.89.222.126 12. august 2006, kell 12:11 (UTC)
- The imaginary unit is meant to be defined in a special article.
- But the problem with the present version is that the imaginary unit can be defined only by means of the concept of complex number. For instance, there are three different quaternions with the same property. Andres 12. august 2006, kell 12:37 (UTC)
Võtsin selle lingi välja, sest ma pole kindel, et see on vajalik.
- Dimensions: a math film. Embedding Complex Numbers in a demonstration of higher dimensions (also Chaostheory) in particular chapter 5 and 6
Andres 7. september 2008, kell 12:26 (UTC)
Pikk jutt ajaloost, kui näiteks komplekasrvu kaaskompleksi pole kusagil mainitud. --Hardi 4. veebruar 2011, kell 15:55 (EET)